In terms of inputs and outputs, Mojo 2 has two 3.5mm analog outputs, and a USB (USB-C or microUSB) and an optical digital input. Just from a cursory examination, you can see how Mojo 2 adheres very closely to Chord’s unique design language, providing color-changing buttons for user controls and nothing else, while Gryphon has a small screen and makes, perhaps, some more industry standard type design decisions in their configuration of buttons, knobs, and switches. While the devices are about the same size, and are pretty close in terms of power output, pretty much every other aspect of the design is very different. As we offer our own take on this hot button question, we’ll cover three main areas: design and specifications, features, and sound. I can absolutely recommend it to everybody!If you comb audiophile forums, or follow HiFi blogs, one of the most common questions or topics from the last year is “Mojo or Gryphon?” While I’ve seen some (relatively hot) takes strongly recommending one over the other, there are a lot of considerations to take into account between these two portable DACs that will help you decide which is better for you. Since I don't have an adapter USB-C to the cipher yet and these are available in Switzerland, the Cobalt is an extremely successful solution, even better than Cipher. But this is far below the dignity of the i3. This is definitely a throw-away, sorry Audeze. But this solution is definitely massively better than the BT cable. The ciphers are even slightly more bass and trebles are a bit reduced. Add to that the openness of the i3, spacious, wide stage. Extremely clean, clear but not poisonous or sibiliant at all. Absolutely clear in the middle, slightly emphasized and with a very nice transition from the bass range. So let's try the i3 and see, it fits!īeautiful sound, excellent bass, extremely clean, absolutely not exaggerated, excellent. ![]() For the i4, the Cobalt doesn't have enough power, so they don't really flourish. Nothing fits and without EQ or cipher with DSP it sounds awful. ![]() IPad Pro with Qobuz, Audioquest Dragonfly Cobalt and the LCDi3. ![]() Here by the way a quite outstanding combination, I am surprised myself how good it is! Overall DFC is an excellent investment, I would highly recommend it. But for Bluetooth functionality and convenience it is an excellent device. I also have the BTR3K from FIIO, in terms of sound quality in wired or wireless mode, DFC is way ahead, there is no competition. The leather case also quite good I have realized if I press the side of the case to make it open and flip, it comes out quite easily. I also am not having any rattling or quality issue. It is very loud and powerful, I have to use it with very low volume with Andromeda. It is working with my Microsoft Surface Pro, Dell desktop with excellent sound quality. Everything is probably up scaled to 48 kHz (blue color), but no popping and clicking sound (as reported in Samsung forums), and sounds surprisingly well! To use other apps like spotify, youtube, amazon prime music I just have to click "no" to the pop up by UAPP. So the MQA files of Tidal plays via UAPP, with the purple light indicator, and with my Andromeda it sounds amazing, there is absolutely no noise. I have also purchased the bit perfect MQA in app module. As soon as I connect the DFC with the supplied dragon tail adapter the UAPP pops up, detects the DFC. ![]() It is working surprisingly well! I already had the UAPP installed. Received the DFC yesterday, and using it with Samsung Galaxy S10 exynos version mainly.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |